Change in Abstract Bipolar Argumentation Systems
نویسندگان
چکیده
An argumentation system can undergo changes (addition or removal of arguments/interactions), particularly in multiagent systems. In this paper, we are interested in dynamics of abstract bipolar argumentation systems, i.e. argumentation systems using two kinds of interaction: attacks and supports. We propose change characterizations that use and extend previous results defined in the case of Dung abstract argumentation systems.
منابع مشابه
Abstract Argumentation and Explanation
Argumentation and Explanation Christian Strasser and Dunja Šešelja {christian.strasser, dunja.seselja}@UGent.be Centre for Logic and Philosophy of Science, Ghent University Abstract. In this paper Dung’s abstract argumentation framework (cp. [6]) is extended with explanatory capabilities. Further, we investigate bipolar argumentation systems (cp. [4]), incorporate values (cp. [3]) and generaliz...
متن کاملTowards a New Framework for Recursive Interactions in Abstract Bipolar Argumentation
This paper proposes a new framework able to take into account recursive interactions in bipolar abstract argumentation systems. We address issues such as “How an interaction can impact another one?”, or in other words “How can the validity of an interaction be affected if this interaction is attacked or supported by another one?”. Thus, using numerous examples, a new method for flattening such ...
متن کاملOn support relations in abstract argumentation as abstractions of inferential relations
Arguably the significance of an abstract model of argumentation depends on the range of realistic instantiations it allows. This paper therefore investigates for three frameworks for abstract argumentation with support relations whether they can be instantiated with the ASPIC framework for structured argumentation. Both evidential argumentation systems and a simple extension of Dung’s abstract ...
متن کاملDynamic of Argumentation Frameworks
My thesis work aims to study change operations for argumentation systems, especially for abstract argumentation systems à la Dung. This paper presents a first study of the AGM revision adapted to the case of argumentation. We also sketch future research works planned to complete the one already achieved.
متن کاملUsing Matrix Exponentials for Abstract Argumentation
We investigate the relationship between semantics for formal argumentation and measures from social networking theory. In particular, we consider using matrix exponentials, which are measures used for link prediction and recommendation in social networks, as a way to measure acceptability of arguments in abstract argumentation frameworks. We reformulate the approach of matrix exponentials to ad...
متن کامل